1
0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/qlib.git synced 2026-06-12 08:50:59 +08:00

Compare commits

..

3 Commits
finco ... 6cma

Author SHA1 Message Date
Huoran Li
1f5f3a6af0 Do not create venv each iteration & use separate data iterator for each parallel worker (#1522)
* Test passed

* CI

* Cache exchange

* Refine backtest scripts

* Minor

* Rename backtest file

* Add async mode for potential use

* Slient backtest. Add .
2023-06-12 12:05:51 +08:00
Huoran Li
2f8fc8d28a Black 2023-05-24 10:37:21 +08:00
Huoran Li
3e9ccd3ad2 Train on full simulation 2023-05-24 10:36:27 +08:00
222 changed files with 1983 additions and 21233 deletions

View File

@@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ categories:
label:
- 'doc'
- 'documentation'
- title: '🧹 Maintenance'
label:
- 'maintenance'
change-template: '- $TITLE @$AUTHOR (#$NUMBER)'
change-title-escapes: '\<*_&' # You can add # and @ to disable mentions, and add ` to disable code blocks.
version-resolver:
@@ -33,4 +30,4 @@ version-resolver:
template: |
## Changes
$CHANGES
$CHANGES

View File

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ jobs:
TWINE_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.PYPI_PASSWORD }}
run: |
twine upload dist/*
deploy_with_manylinux:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:

View File

@@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ jobs:
stale-issue-label: 'stale'
stale-pr-label: 'stale'
days-before-stale: 90
days-before-pr-stale: 365
days-before-close: 5
operations-per-run: 100
exempt-issue-labels: 'bug,enhancement'
remove-stale-when-updated: true
remove-stale-when-updated: true

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ on:
jobs:
build:
if: ${{ false }} # FIXME: temporarily disable... Due to we are rushing a feature
timeout-minutes: 120
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
@@ -20,20 +19,10 @@ jobs:
steps:
- name: Test qlib from pip
uses: actions/checkout@v3
# Since version 3.7 of python for MacOS is installed in CI, version 3.7.17, this version causes "_bz not found error".
# So we make the version number of python 3.7 for MacOS more specific.
# refs: https://github.com/actions/setup-python/issues/682
- name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
if: (matrix.os == 'macos-latest' && matrix.python-version == '3.7') || (matrix.os == 'macos-11' && matrix.python-version == '3.7')
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: "3.7.16"
uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
if: (matrix.os != 'macos-latest' || matrix.python-version != '3.7') && (matrix.os != 'macos-11' || matrix.python-version != '3.7')
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
uses: actions/setup-python@v2
with:
python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
@@ -61,9 +50,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Downloads dependencies data
run: |
cd ..
python -m qlib.run.get_data qlib_data --target_dir ~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data --region cn
cd qlib
python scripts/get_data.py qlib_data --name qlib_data_simple --target_dir ~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data --interval 1d --region cn
- name: Test workflow by config
run: |

View File

@@ -20,28 +20,18 @@ jobs:
steps:
- name: Test qlib from source
uses: actions/checkout@v3
# Since version 3.7 of python for MacOS is installed in CI, version 3.7.17, this version causes "_bz not found error".
# So we make the version number of python 3.7 for MacOS more specific.
# refs: https://github.com/actions/setup-python/issues/682
- name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
if: (matrix.os == 'macos-latest' && matrix.python-version == '3.7') || (matrix.os == 'macos-11' && matrix.python-version == '3.7')
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: "3.7.16"
uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
if: (matrix.os != 'macos-latest' || matrix.python-version != '3.7') && (matrix.os != 'macos-11' || matrix.python-version != '3.7')
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
uses: actions/setup-python@v2
with:
python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
- name: Update pip to the latest version
# pip release version 23.1 on Apr.15 2023, CI failed to run, Please refer to #1495 ofr detailed logs.
# The pip version has been temporarily fixed to 23.0
# The pip version has been temporarily fixed to 23.0.1
run: |
python -m pip install pip==23.0
python -m pip install pip==23.0.1
- name: Installing pytorch for macos
if: ${{ matrix.os == 'macos-11' || matrix.os == 'macos-latest' }}
@@ -64,10 +54,7 @@ jobs:
python -m pip install -e .[dev]
- name: Lint with Black
# Python 3.7 will use a black with low level. So we use python with higher version for black check
if: (matrix.python-version != '3.7')
run: |
pip install -U black # follow the latest version of black, previous Qlib dependency will downgrade black
black . -l 120 --check --diff
- name: Make html with sphinx
@@ -142,7 +129,8 @@ jobs:
- name: Test data downloads
run: |
python scripts/get_data.py qlib_data --name qlib_data_simple --target_dir ~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data --interval 1d --region cn
python scripts/get_data.py download_data --file_name rl_data.zip --target_dir tests/.data/rl
azcopy copy https://qlibpublic.blob.core.windows.net/data/rl /tmp/qlibpublic/data --recursive
mv /tmp/qlibpublic/data tests/.data
- name: Install Lightgbm for MacOS
if: ${{ matrix.os == 'macos-11' || matrix.os == 'macos-latest' }}

View File

@@ -20,28 +20,18 @@ jobs:
steps:
- name: Test qlib from source slow
uses: actions/checkout@v3
# Since version 3.7 of python for MacOS is installed in CI, version 3.7.17, this version causes "_bz not found error".
# So we make the version number of python 3.7 for MacOS more specific.
# refs: https://github.com/actions/setup-python/issues/682
- name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
if: (matrix.os == 'macos-latest' && matrix.python-version == '3.7') || (matrix.os == 'macos-11' && matrix.python-version == '3.7')
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: "3.7.16"
uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
if: (matrix.os != 'macos-latest' || matrix.python-version != '3.7') && (matrix.os != 'macos-11' || matrix.python-version != '3.7')
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
uses: actions/setup-python@v2
with:
python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
- name: Set up Python tools
# pip release version 23.1 on Apr.15 2023, CI failed to run, Please refer to #1495 ofr detailed logs.
# The pip version has been temporarily fixed to 23.0
# The pip version has been temporarily fixed to 23.0.1
run: |
python -m pip install pip==23.0
python -m pip install pip==23.0.1
pip install --upgrade cython numpy
pip install -e .[dev]

4
.gitignore vendored
View File

@@ -22,10 +22,6 @@ dist/
qlib/VERSION.txt
qlib/data/_libs/expanding.cpp
qlib/data/_libs/rolling.cpp
qlib/finco/prompt_cache.json
qlib/finco/finco_workspace/
qlib/finco/knowledge/*/knowledge.pkl
qlib/finco/knowledge/*/storage.yml
examples/estimator/estimator_example/
examples/rl/data/
examples/rl/checkpoints/

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
repos:
- repo: https://github.com/psf/black
rev: 23.7.0
rev: 22.6.0
hooks:
- id: black
args: ["qlib", "-l 120"]
@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ repos:
rev: 4.0.1
hooks:
- id: flake8
args: ["--ignore=E501,F541,E266,E402,W503,E731,E203"]
args: ["--ignore=E501,F541,E266,E402,W503,E731,E203"]

View File

@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
Recent released features
| Feature | Status |
| -- | ------ |
| KRNN and Sandwich models | :chart_with_upwards_trend: [Released](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1414/) on May 26, 2023 |
| Release Qlib v0.9.0 | :octocat: [Released](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/releases/tag/v0.9.0) on Dec 9, 2022 |
| RL Learning Framework | :hammer: :chart_with_upwards_trend: Released on Nov 10, 2022. [#1332](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1332), [#1322](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1322), [#1316](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1316),[#1299](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1299),[#1263](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1263), [#1244](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1244), [#1169](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1169), [#1125](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1125), [#1076](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1076)|
| HIST and IGMTF models | :chart_with_upwards_trend: [Released](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1040) on Apr 10, 2022 |
@@ -91,7 +90,6 @@ For more details, please refer to our paper ["Qlib: An AI-oriented Quantitative
</ul>
</li>
<li type="circle"><a href="#adapting-to-market-dynamics">Adapting to Market Dynamics</a></li>
<li type="circle"><a href="#reinforcement-learning-modeling-continuous-decisions">Reinforcement Learning: modeling continuous decisions</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</td>
@@ -355,8 +353,6 @@ Here is a list of models built on `Qlib`.
- [ADD based on pytorch (Hongshun Tang, et al.2020)](examples/benchmarks/ADD/)
- [IGMTF based on pytorch (Wentao Xu, et al.2021)](examples/benchmarks/IGMTF/)
- [HIST based on pytorch (Wentao Xu, et al.2021)](examples/benchmarks/HIST/)
- [KRNN based on pytorch](examples/benchmarks/KRNN/)
- [Sandwich based on pytorch](examples/benchmarks/Sandwich/)
Your PR of new Quant models is highly welcomed.
@@ -393,17 +389,6 @@ Here is a list of solutions built on `Qlib`.
- [Rolling Retraining](examples/benchmarks_dynamic/baseline/)
- [DDG-DA on pytorch (Wendi, et al. AAAI 2022)](examples/benchmarks_dynamic/DDG-DA/)
## Reinforcement Learning: modeling continuous decisions
Qlib now supports reinforcement learning, a feature designed to model continuous investment decisions. This functionality assists investors in optimizing their trading strategies by learning from interactions with the environment to maximize some notion of cumulative reward.
Here is a list of solutions built on `Qlib` categorized by scenarios.
### [RL for order execution](examples/rl_order_execution)
[Here](https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/overall.html#order-execution) is the introduction of this scenario. All the methods below are compared [here](examples/rl_order_execution).
- [TWAP](examples/rl_order_execution/exp_configs/backtest_twap.yml)
- [PPO: "An End-to-End Optimal Trade Execution Framework based on Proximal Policy Optimization", IJCAL 2020](examples/rl_order_execution/exp_configs/backtest_ppo.yml)
- [OPDS: "Universal Trading for Order Execution with Oracle Policy Distillation", AAAI 2021](examples/rl_order_execution/exp_configs/backtest_opds.yml)
# Quant Dataset Zoo
Dataset plays a very important role in Quant. Here is a list of the datasets built on `Qlib`:

View File

@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Here are some example:
for daily data:
.. code-block:: bash
python scripts/get_data.py download_data --file_name csv_data_cn.zip --target_dir ~/.qlib/csv_data/cn_data
python scripts/get_data.py csv_data_cn --target_dir ~/.qlib/csv_data/cn_data
for 1min data:
.. code-block:: bash

View File

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
========
Guidance
========
.. currentmodule:: qlib
QlibRL can help users quickly get started and conveniently implement quantitative strategies based on reinforcement learning(RL) algorithms. For different user groups, we recommend the following guidance to use QlibRL.
Beginners to Reinforcement Learning Algorithms
==============================================
Whether you are a quantitative researcher who wants to understand what RL can do in trading or a learner who wants to get started with RL algorithms in trading scenarios, if you have limited knowledge of RL and want to shield various detailed settings to quickly get started with RL algorithms, we recommend the following sequence to learn qlibrl:
- Learn the fundamentals of RL in `part1 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/overall.html#reinforcement-learning>`_.
- Understand the trading scenarios where RL methods can be applied in `part2 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/overall.html#potential-application-scenarios-in-quantitative-trading>`_.
- Run the examples in `part3 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/quickstart.html>`_ to solve trading problems using RL.
- If you want to further explore QlibRL and make some customizations, you need to first understand the framework of QlibRL in `part4 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/framework.html>`_ and rewrite specific components according to your needs.
Reinforcement Learning Algorithm Researcher
==============================================
If you are already familiar with existing RL algorithms and dedicated to researching RL algorithms but lack domain knowledge in the financial field, and you want to validate the effectiveness of your algorithms in financial trading scenarios, we recommend the following steps to get started with QlibRL:
- Understand the trading scenarios where RL methods can be applied in `part2 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/overall.html#potential-application-scenarios-in-quantitative-trading>`_.
- Choose an RL application scenario (currently, QlibRL has implemented two scenario examples: order execution and algorithmic trading). Run the example in `part3 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/quickstart.html>`_ to get it working.
- Modify the `policy <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/qlib/rl/order_execution/policy.py>`_ part to incorporate your own RL algorithm.
Quantitative Researcher
=======================
If you have a certain level of financial domain knowledge and coding skills, and you want to explore the application of RL algorithms in the investment field, we recommend the following steps to explore QlibRL:
- Learn the fundamentals of RL in `part1 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/overall.html#reinforcement-learning>`_.
- Understand the trading scenarios where RL methods can be applied in `part2 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/overall.html#potential-application-scenarios-in-quantitative-trading>`_.
- Run the examples in `part3 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/quickstart.html>`_ to solve trading problems using RL.
- Understand the framework of QlibRL in `part4 <https://qlib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/component/rl/framework.html>`_.
- Choose a suitable RL algorithm based on the characteristics of the problem you want to solve (currently, QlibRL supports PPO and DQN algorithms based on tianshou).
- Design the MDP (Markov Decision Process) process based on market trading rules and the problem you want to solve. Refer to the example in order execution and make corresponding modifications to the following modules: `State <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/qlib/rl/order_execution/state.py#L70>`_, `Metrics <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/qlib/rl/order_execution/state.py#L18>`_, `ActionInterpreter <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/qlib/rl/order_execution/interpreter.py#L199>`_, `StateInterpreter <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/qlib/rl/order_execution/interpreter.py#L68>`_, `Reward <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/qlib/rl/order_execution/reward.py>`_, `Observation <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/qlib/rl/order_execution/interpreter.py#L44>`_, `Simulator <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/qlib/rl/order_execution/simulator_simple.py>`_.

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Reinforcement Learning in Quantitative Trading
Reinforcement Learning
======================
Different from supervised learning tasks such as classification tasks and regression tasks. Another important paradigm in machine learning is Reinforcement Learning(RL),
Different from supervised learning tasks such as classification tasks and regression tasks. Another important paradigm in machine learning is Reinforcement Learning,
which attempts to optimize an accumulative numerical reward signal by directly interacting with the environment under a few assumptions such as Markov Decision Process(MDP).
As demonstrated in the following figure, an RL system consists of four elements, 1)the agent 2) the environment the agent interacts with 3) the policy that the agent follows to take actions on the environment and 4)the reward signal from the environment to the agent.
@@ -25,46 +25,26 @@ The Qlib Reinforcement Learning toolkit (QlibRL) is an RL platform for quantitat
Potential Application Scenarios in Quantitative Trading
=======================================================
RL methods have demonstrated remarkable achievements in various applications, including game playing, resource allocation, recommendation systems, marketing, and advertising.
In the context of investment, which involves continuous decision-making, let's consider the example of the stock market. Investors strive to optimize their investment returns by effectively managing their positions and stock holdings through various buying and selling behaviors.
Furthermore, investors carefully evaluate market conditions and stock-specific information before making each buying or selling decision. From an investor's perspective, this process can be viewed as a continuous decision-making process driven by interactions with the market. RL algorithms offer a promising approach to tackle such challenges.
Here are several scenarios where RL holds potential for application in quantitative investment.
Order Execution
---------------
The order execution task is to execute orders efficiently while considering multiple factors, including optimal prices, minimizing trading costs, reducing market impact, maximizing order fullfill rates, and achieving execution within a specified time frame. RL can be applied to such tasks by incorporating these objectives into the reward function and action selection process. Specifically, the RL agent interacts with the market environment, observes the state from market information, and makes decisions on next step execution. The RL algorithm learns an optimal execution strategy through trial and error, aiming to maximize the expected cumulative reward, which incorporates the desired objectives.
- General Setting
- Environment: The environment represents the financial market where order execution takes place. It encompasses variables such as the order book dynamics, liquidity, price movements, and market conditions.
- State: The state refers to the information available to the RL agent at a given time step. It typically includes features such as the current order book state (bid-ask spread, order depth), historical price data, historical trading volume, market volatility, and any other relevant information that can aid in decision-making.
- Action: The action is the decision made by the RL agent based on the observed state. In order execution, actions can include selecting the order size, price, and timing of execution.
- Reward: The reward is a scalar signal that indicates the performance of the RL agent's action in the environment. The reward function is designed to encourage actions that lead to efficient and cost-effective order execution. It typically considers multiple objectives, such as maximizing price advantages, minimizing trading costs (including transaction fees and slippage), reducing market impact (the effect of the order on the market price) and maximizing order fullfill rates.
- Scenarios
- Single-asset order execution: Single-asset order execution focuses on the task of executing a single order for a specific asset, such as a stock or a cryptocurrency. The primary objective is to execute the order efficiently while considering factors such as maximizing price advantages, minimizing trading costs, reducing market impact, and achieving a high fullfill rate. The RL agent interacts with the market environment and makes decisions on order size, price, and timing of execution for that particular asset. The goal is to learn an optimal execution strategy for the single asset, maximizing the expected cumulative reward while considering the specific dynamics and characteristics of that asset.
- Multi-asset order execution: Multi-asset order execution expands the order execution task to involve multiple assets or securities. It typically involves executing a portfolio of orders across different assets simultaneously or sequentially. Unlike single-asset order execution, the focus is not only on the execution of individual orders but also on managing the interactions and dependencies between different assets within the portfolio. The RL agent needs to make decisions on the order sizes, prices, and timings for each asset in the portfolio, considering their interdependencies, cash constraints, market conditions, and transaction costs. The goal is to learn an optimal execution strategy that balances the execution efficiency for each asset while considering the overall performance and objectives of the portfolio as a whole.
The choice of settings and RL algorithm depends on the specific requirements of the task, available data, and desired performance objectives.
RL methods have already achieved outstanding achievement in many applications, such as game playing, resource allocating, recommendation, marketing and advertising, etc.
Investment is always a continuous process, taking the stock market as an example, investors need to control their positions and stock holdings by one or more buying and selling behaviors, to maximize the investment returns.
Besides, each buy and sell decision is made by investors after fully considering the overall market information and stock information.
From the view of an investor, the process could be described as a continuous decision-making process generated according to interaction with the market, such problems could be solved by the RL algorithms.
Following are some scenarios where RL can potentially be used in quantitative investment.
Portfolio Construction
----------------------
Portfolio construction is a process of selecting and allocating assets in an investment portfolio. RL provides a framework to optimize portfolio management decisions by learning from interactions with the market environment and maximizing long-term returns while considering risk management.
- General Setting
- State: The state represents the current information about the market and the portfolio. It typically includes historical prices and volumes, technical indicators, and other relevant data.
Portfolio construction is a process of selecting securities optimally by taking a minimum risk to achieve maximum returns. With an RL-based solution, an agent allocates stocks at every time step by obtaining information for each stock and the market. The key is to develop of policy for building a portfolio and make the policy able to pick the optimal portfolio.
- Action: The action corresponds to the decision of allocating capital to different assets in the portfolio. It determines the weights or proportions of investments in each asset.
Order Execution
---------------
As a fundamental problem in algorithmic trading, order execution aims at fulfilling a specific trading order, either liquidation or acquirement, for a given instrument. Essentially, the goal of order execution is twofold: it not only requires to fulfill the whole order but also targets a more economical execution with maximizing profit gain (or minimizing capital loss). The order execution with only one order of liquidation or acquirement is called single-asset order execution.
- Reward: The reward is a metric that evaluates the performance of the portfolio. It can be defined in various ways, such as total return, risk-adjusted return, or other objectives like maximizing Sharpe ratio or minimizing drawdown.
Considering stock investment always aim to pursue long-term maximized profits, it usually manifests as a sequential process of continuously adjusting the asset portfolios, execution for multiple orders, including order of liquidation and acquirement, brings more constraints and makes the sequence of execution for different orders should be considered, e.g. before executing an order to buy some stocks, we have to sell at least one stock. The order execution with multiple assets is called multi-asset order execution.
- Scenarios
- Stock market: RL can be used to construct portfolios of stocks, where the agent learns to allocate capital among different stocks.
According to the order executions trait of sequential decision-making, an RL-based solution could be applied to solve the order execution. With an RL-based solution, an agent optimizes execution strategy by interacting with the market environment.
- Cryptocurrency market: RL can be applied to construct portfolios of cryptocurrencies, where the agent learns to make allocation decisions.
With QlibRL, the RL algorithm in the above scenarios can be easily implemented.
- Foreign exchange (Forex) market: RL can be used to construct portfolios of currency pairs, where the agent learns to allocate capital across different currencies based on exchange rate data, economic indicators, and other factors.
Similarly, the choice of basic setting and algorithm depends on the specific requirements of the problem and the characteristics of the market.
Nested Portfolio Construction and Order Executor
------------------------------------------------
QlibRL makes it possible to jointly optimize different levels of strategies/models/agents. Take `Nested Decision Execution Framework <https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/examples/nested_decision_execution>`_ as an example, the optimization of order execution strategy and portfolio management strategies can interact with each other to maximize returns.

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ Reinforcement Learning in Quantitative Trading
========================================================================
.. toctree::
Guidance <guidance>
Overall <overall>
Quick Start <quickstart>
Framework <framework>

View File

@@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ Below is a typical config file of ``qrun``.
kwargs:
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
backtest:
limit_threshold: 0.095
account: 100000000
@@ -279,7 +281,9 @@ The following script is the configuration of `backtest` and the `strategy` used
kwargs:
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
backtest:
limit_threshold: 0.095
account: 100000000

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:
@@ -87,4 +89,4 @@ task:
- class: PortAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
config: *port_analysis_config
config: *port_analysis_config

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
# KRNN
* Code: [https://github.com/microsoft/FOST/blob/main/fostool/model/krnn.py](https://github.com/microsoft/FOST/blob/main/fostool/model/krnn.py)
# Introductions about the settings/configs.
* Torch_geometric is used in the original model in FOST, but we didn't use it.
* make use your CUDA version matches the torch version to allow the usage of GPU, we use CUDA==10.2 and torch.__version__==1.12.1

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
numpy==1.23.4
pandas==1.5.2

View File

@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
qlib_init:
provider_uri: "~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data"
region: cn
market: &market csi300
benchmark: &benchmark SH000300
data_handler_config: &data_handler_config
start_time: 2008-01-01
end_time: 2020-08-01
fit_start_time: 2008-01-01
fit_end_time: 2014-12-31
instruments: *market
infer_processors:
- class: RobustZScoreNorm
kwargs:
fields_group: feature
clip_outlier: true
- class: Fillna
kwargs:
fields_group: feature
learn_processors:
- class: DropnaLabel
- class: CSRankNorm
kwargs:
fields_group: label
label: ["Ref($close, -2) / Ref($close, -1) - 1"]
port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
strategy:
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:
start_time: 2017-01-01
end_time: 2020-08-01
account: 100000000
benchmark: *benchmark
exchange_kwargs:
limit_threshold: 0.095
deal_price: close
open_cost: 0.0005
close_cost: 0.0015
min_cost: 5
task:
model:
class: KRNN
module_path: qlib.contrib.model.pytorch_krnn
kwargs:
fea_dim: 6
cnn_dim: 8
cnn_kernel_size: 3
rnn_dim: 8
rnn_dups: 2
rnn_layers: 2
n_epochs: 200
lr: 0.001
early_stop: 20
batch_size: 2000
metric: loss
GPU: 0
dataset:
class: DatasetH
module_path: qlib.data.dataset
kwargs:
handler:
class: Alpha360
module_path: qlib.contrib.data.handler
kwargs: *data_handler_config
segments:
train: [2008-01-01, 2014-12-31]
valid: [2015-01-01, 2016-12-31]
test: [2017-01-01, 2020-08-01]
record:
- class: SignalRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
- class: SigAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
ana_long_short: False
ann_scaler: 252
- class: PortAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
config: *port_analysis_config

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ class Avg15minHandler(DataHandlerLP):
)
def loader_config(self):
# Results for dataset: df: pd.DataFrame
# len(df.columns) == 6 + 6 * 16, len(df.index.get_level_values(level="datetime").unique()) == T
# df.columns: close0, close1, ..., close16, open0, ..., open16, ..., vwap16

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
kwargs:
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
backtest:
verbose: False
limit_threshold: 0.095

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -31,7 +31,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -41,7 +41,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -41,7 +41,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ The numbers shown below demonstrate the performance of the entire `workflow` of
| Model Name | Dataset | IC | ICIR | Rank IC | Rank ICIR | Annualized Return | Information Ratio | Max Drawdown |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------------|-------------------|--------------|
| TCN(Shaojie Bai, et al.) | Alpha158 | 0.0279±0.00 | 0.2181±0.01 | 0.0421±0.00 | 0.3429±0.01 | 0.0262±0.02 | 0.4133±0.25 | -0.1090±0.03 |
| TCN(Shaojie Bai, et al.) | Alpha158 | 0.0275±0.00 | 0.2157±0.01 | 0.0411±0.00 | 0.3379±0.01 | 0.0190±0.02 | 0.2887±0.27 | -0.1202±0.03 |
| TabNet(Sercan O. Arik, et al.) | Alpha158 | 0.0204±0.01 | 0.1554±0.07 | 0.0333±0.00 | 0.2552±0.05 | 0.0227±0.04 | 0.3676±0.54 | -0.1089±0.08 |
| Transformer(Ashish Vaswani, et al.) | Alpha158 | 0.0264±0.00 | 0.2053±0.02 | 0.0407±0.00 | 0.3273±0.02 | 0.0273±0.02 | 0.3970±0.26 | -0.1101±0.02 |
| GRU(Kyunghyun Cho, et al.) | Alpha158(with selected 20 features) | 0.0315±0.00 | 0.2450±0.04 | 0.0428±0.00 | 0.3440±0.03 | 0.0344±0.02 | 0.5160±0.25 | -0.1017±0.02 |
@@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ The numbers shown below demonstrate the performance of the entire `workflow` of
| TRA(Hengxu Lin, et al.) | Alpha360 | 0.0485±0.00 | 0.3787±0.03 | 0.0587±0.00 | 0.4756±0.03 | 0.0920±0.03 | 1.2789±0.42 | -0.0834±0.02 |
| IGMTF(Wentao Xu, et al.) | Alpha360 | 0.0480±0.00 | 0.3589±0.02 | 0.0606±0.00 | 0.4773±0.01 | 0.0946±0.02 | 1.3509±0.25 | -0.0716±0.02 |
| HIST(Wentao Xu, et al.) | Alpha360 | 0.0522±0.00 | 0.3530±0.01 | 0.0667±0.00 | 0.4576±0.01 | 0.0987±0.02 | 1.3726±0.27 | -0.0681±0.01 |
| KRNN | Alpha360 | 0.0173±0.01 | 0.1210±0.06 | 0.0270±0.01 | 0.2018±0.04 | -0.0465±0.05 | -0.5415±0.62 | -0.2919±0.13 |
| Sandwich | Alpha360 | 0.0258±0.00 | 0.1924±0.04 | 0.0337±0.00 | 0.2624±0.03 | 0.0005±0.03 | 0.0001±0.33 | -0.1752±0.05 |
- The selected 20 features are based on the feature importance of a lightgbm-based model.
@@ -136,7 +134,7 @@ If you want to contribute your new models, you can follow the steps below.
- `README.md`: a brief introduction to your models
- `workflow_config_<model name>_<dataset>.yaml`: a configuration which can read by `qrun`. You are encouraged to run your model in all datasets.
3. You can integrate your model as a module [in this folder](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/tree/main/qlib/contrib/model).
4. Please update your results in the above **Benchmark Tables**, e.g. [Alpha360](#alpha158-dataset), [Alpha158](#alpha158-dataset)(the values of each metric are the mean and std calculated based on **20 Runs** with different random seeds. You can accomplish the above operations through the automated [script](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/blob/main/examples/run_all_model.py#LL286C22-L286C22) provided by Qlib, and get the final result in the .md file. if you don't have enough computational resource, you can ask for help in the PR).
4. Please updated your results in the benchmark tables, e.g. [Alpha360](#alpha158-dataset), [Alpha158](#alpha158-dataset)(the values of each metric are the mean and std calculated based on 20 runs with different random seeds, if you don't have enough computational resource, you can ask for help in the PR).
5. Update the info in the index page in the [news list](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib#newspaper-whats-new----sparkling_heart) and [model list](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib#quant-model-paper-zoo).
Finally, you can send PR for review. ([here is an example](https://github.com/microsoft/qlib/pull/1040))

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
# Sandwich
* Code: [https://github.com/microsoft/FOST/blob/main/fostool/model/sandwich.py](https://github.com/microsoft/FOST/blob/main/fostool/model/sandwich.py)
# Introductions about the settings/configs.
* Torch_geometric is used in the original model in FOST, but we didn't use it.
make use your CUDA version matches the torch version to allow the usage of GPU, we use CUDA==10.2 and torch.version==1.12.1

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
numpy==1.23.4
pandas==1.5.2

View File

@@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
qlib_init:
provider_uri: "~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data"
region: cn
market: &market csi300
benchmark: &benchmark SH000300
data_handler_config: &data_handler_config
start_time: 2008-01-01
end_time: 2020-08-01
fit_start_time: 2008-01-01
fit_end_time: 2014-12-31
instruments: *market
infer_processors:
- class: RobustZScoreNorm
kwargs:
fields_group: feature
clip_outlier: true
- class: Fillna
kwargs:
fields_group: feature
learn_processors:
- class: DropnaLabel
- class: CSRankNorm
kwargs:
fields_group: label
label: ["Ref($close, -2) / Ref($close, -1) - 1"]
port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
strategy:
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:
start_time: 2017-01-01
end_time: 2020-08-01
account: 100000000
benchmark: *benchmark
exchange_kwargs:
limit_threshold: 0.095
deal_price: close
open_cost: 0.0005
close_cost: 0.0015
min_cost: 5
task:
model:
class: Sandwich
module_path: qlib.contrib.model.pytorch_sandwich
kwargs:
fea_dim: 6
cnn_dim_1: 16
cnn_dim_2: 16
cnn_kernel_size: 3
rnn_dim_1: 8
rnn_dim_2: 8
rnn_dups: 2
rnn_layers: 2
n_epochs: 200
lr: 0.001
early_stop: 20
batch_size: 2000
metric: loss
GPU: 0
dataset:
class: DatasetH
module_path: qlib.data.dataset
kwargs:
handler:
class: Alpha360
module_path: qlib.contrib.data.handler
kwargs: *data_handler_config
segments:
train: [2008-01-01, 2014-12-31]
valid: [2015-01-01, 2016-12-31]
test: [2017-01-01, 2020-08-01]
record:
- class: SignalRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
- class: SigAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
ana_long_short: False
ann_scaler: 252
- class: PortAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
config: *port_analysis_config

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -30,7 +30,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:
@@ -93,4 +95,4 @@ task:
- class: PortAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
config: *port_analysis_config
config: *port_analysis_config

View File

@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ class GenericDataFormatter(abc.ABC):
# Sanity checks first.
# Ensure only one ID and time column exist
def _check_single_column(input_type):
length = len([tup for tup in column_definition if tup[2] == input_type])
if length != 1:

View File

@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ class ExperimentConfig:
@property
def hyperparam_iterations(self):
return 240 if self.experiment == "volatility" else 60
def make_data_formatter(self):

View File

@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ class HyperparamOptManager:
params_file = os.path.join(self.hyperparam_folder, "params.csv")
if os.path.exists(results_file) and os.path.exists(params_file):
self.results = pd.read_csv(results_file, index_col=0)
self.saved_params = pd.read_csv(params_file, index_col=0)
@@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ class HyperparamOptManager:
return parameters
for _ in range(self._max_tries):
parameters = _get_next()
name = self._get_name(parameters)

View File

@@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ class TemporalFusionTransformer:
embeddings = []
for i in range(num_categorical_variables):
embedding = tf.keras.Sequential(
[
tf.keras.layers.InputLayer([time_steps]),
@@ -679,6 +680,7 @@ class TemporalFusionTransformer:
data_map = {}
for _, sliced in data.groupby(id_col):
col_mappings = {"identifier": [id_col], "time": [time_col], "outputs": [target_col], "inputs": input_cols}
for k in col_mappings:
@@ -952,6 +954,7 @@ class TemporalFusionTransformer:
"""
with tf.variable_scope(self.name):
transformer_layer, all_inputs, attention_components = self._build_base_graph()
outputs = tf.keras.layers.TimeDistributed(tf.keras.layers.Dense(self.output_size * len(self.quantiles)))(

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ from qlib.utils import init_instance_by_config
def main(seed, config_file="configs/config_alstm.yaml"):
# set random seed
with open(config_file) as f:
config = yaml.safe_load(f)
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ def main(seed, config_file="configs/config_alstm.yaml"):
if __name__ == "__main__":
# set params from cmd
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(allow_abbrev=False)
parser.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=1000, help="random seed")

View File

@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ class MTSDatasetH(DatasetH):
drop_last=False,
**kwargs,
):
assert horizon > 0, "please specify `horizon` to avoid data leakage"
self.seq_len = seq_len
@@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ class MTSDatasetH(DatasetH):
super().__init__(handler, segments, **kwargs)
def setup_data(self, handler_kwargs: dict = None, **kwargs):
super().setup_data()
# change index to <code, date>

View File

@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ class TRAModel(Model):
avg_params=True,
**kwargs,
):
np.random.seed(seed)
torch.manual_seed(seed)
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ class TRAModel(Model):
self.global_step = -1
def train_epoch(self, data_set):
self.model.train()
self.tra.train()
@@ -144,6 +146,7 @@ class TRAModel(Model):
return total_loss
def test_epoch(self, data_set, return_pred=False):
self.model.eval()
self.tra.eval()
data_set.eval()
@@ -201,6 +204,7 @@ class TRAModel(Model):
return metrics, preds
def fit(self, dataset, evals_result=dict()):
train_set, valid_set, test_set = dataset.prepare(["train", "valid", "test"])
best_score = -1
@@ -376,6 +380,7 @@ class LSTM(nn.Module):
self.output_size = hidden_size
def forward(self, x):
x = self.input_drop(x)
if self.training and self.noise_level > 0:
@@ -459,6 +464,7 @@ class Transformer(nn.Module):
self.output_size = hidden_size
def forward(self, x):
x = self.input_drop(x)
if self.training and self.noise_level > 0:
@@ -508,6 +514,7 @@ class TRA(nn.Module):
self.predictors = nn.Linear(input_size, num_states)
def forward(self, hidden, hist_loss):
preds = self.predictors(hidden)
if self.num_states == 1:

View File

@@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -51,7 +51,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -51,7 +51,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
signal:
- <MODEL>
- <DATASET>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:

View File

@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
.PHONY: clean
clean:
-rm -r *.pkl mlruns || true

View File

@@ -16,12 +16,12 @@ Though the dataset is different, the conclusion remains the same. By applying `D
# Run the Code
Users can try `DDG-DA` by running the following command:
```bash
python workflow.py run
python workflow.py run_all
```
The default forecasting models are `Linear`. Users can choose other forecasting models by changing the `forecast_model` parameter when `DDG-DA` initializes. For example, users can try `LightGBM` forecasting models by running the following command:
```bash
python workflow.py --conf_path=../workflow_config_lightgbm_Alpha158.yaml run
python workflow.py --forecast_model="gbdt" run_all
```
# Results

View File

@@ -1,40 +1,302 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
# Licensed under the MIT License.
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Union
from qlib.model.meta.task import MetaTask
from qlib.contrib.meta.data_selection.model import MetaModelDS
from qlib.contrib.meta.data_selection.dataset import InternalData, MetaDatasetDS
from qlib.data.dataset.handler import DataHandlerLP
import pandas as pd
import fire
import sys
import pickle
from typing import Optional
from qlib import auto_init
from qlib.contrib.rolling.ddgda import DDGDA
from qlib.model.trainer import TrainerR
from qlib.typehint import Literal
from qlib.utils import init_instance_by_config
from qlib.workflow import R
from qlib.tests.data import GetData
DIRNAME = Path(__file__).absolute().resolve().parent
BENCH_DIR = DIRNAME.parent / "baseline"
sys.path.append(str(DIRNAME.parent / "baseline"))
from rolling_benchmark import RollingBenchmark # NOTE: sys.path is changed for import RollingBenchmark
class DDGDABench(DDGDA):
# The config in the README.md
CONF_LIST = [
BENCH_DIR / "workflow_config_linear_Alpha158.yaml",
BENCH_DIR / "workflow_config_lightgbm_Alpha158.yaml",
]
class DDGDA:
"""
please run `python workflow.py run_all` to run the full workflow of the experiment
DEFAULT_CONF = CONF_LIST[0] # Linear by default due to efficiency
**NOTE**
before running the example, please clean your previous results with following command
- `rm -r mlruns`
"""
def __init__(self, conf_path: Union[str, Path] = DEFAULT_CONF, horizon=20, **kwargs) -> None:
# This code is for being compatible with the previous old code
conf_path = Path(conf_path)
super().__init__(conf_path=conf_path, horizon=horizon, working_dir=DIRNAME, **kwargs)
def __init__(
self,
sim_task_model: Literal["linear", "gbdt"] = "linear",
forecast_model: Literal["linear", "gbdt"] = "linear",
h_path: Optional[str] = None,
test_end: Optional[str] = None,
train_start: Optional[str] = None,
meta_1st_train_end: Optional[str] = None,
task_ext_conf: Optional[dict] = None,
alpha: float = 0.0,
proxy_hd: str = "handler_proxy.pkl",
):
"""
for f in self.CONF_LIST:
if conf_path.samefile(f):
break
else:
self.logger.warning("Model type is not in the benchmark!")
Parameters
----------
train_start: Optional[str]
the start datetime for data. It is used in training start time (for both tasks & meta learing)
test_end: Optional[str]
the end datetime for data. It is used in test end time
meta_1st_train_end: Optional[str]
the datetime of training end of the first meta_task
alpha: float
Setting the L2 regularization for ridge
The `alpha` is only passed to MetaModelDS (it is not passed to sim_task_model currently..)
"""
self.step = 20
# NOTE:
# the horizon must match the meaning in the base task template
self.horizon = 20
self.meta_exp_name = "DDG-DA"
self.sim_task_model = sim_task_model # The model to capture the distribution of data.
self.forecast_model = forecast_model # downstream forecasting models' type
self.rb_kwargs = {
"h_path": h_path,
"test_end": test_end,
"train_start": train_start,
"task_ext_conf": task_ext_conf,
}
self.alpha = alpha
self.meta_1st_train_end = meta_1st_train_end
self.proxy_hd = proxy_hd
def get_feature_importance(self):
# this must be lightGBM, because it needs to get the feature importance
rb = RollingBenchmark(model_type="gbdt", **self.rb_kwargs)
task = rb.basic_task()
with R.start(experiment_name="feature_importance"):
model = init_instance_by_config(task["model"])
dataset = init_instance_by_config(task["dataset"])
model.fit(dataset)
fi = model.get_feature_importance()
# Because the model use numpy instead of dataframe for training lightgbm
# So the we must use following extra steps to get the right feature importance
df = dataset.prepare(segments=slice(None), col_set="feature", data_key=DataHandlerLP.DK_R)
cols = df.columns
fi_named = {cols[int(k.split("_")[1])]: imp for k, imp in fi.to_dict().items()}
return pd.Series(fi_named)
def dump_data_for_proxy_model(self):
"""
Dump data for training meta model.
The meta model will be trained upon the proxy forecasting model.
This dataset is for the proxy forecasting model.
"""
topk = 30
fi = self.get_feature_importance()
col_selected = fi.nlargest(topk)
rb = RollingBenchmark(model_type=self.sim_task_model, **self.rb_kwargs)
task = rb.basic_task()
dataset = init_instance_by_config(task["dataset"])
prep_ds = dataset.prepare(slice(None), col_set=["feature", "label"], data_key=DataHandlerLP.DK_L)
feature_df = prep_ds["feature"]
label_df = prep_ds["label"]
feature_selected = feature_df.loc[:, col_selected.index]
feature_selected = feature_selected.groupby("datetime").apply(lambda df: (df - df.mean()).div(df.std()))
feature_selected = feature_selected.fillna(0.0)
df_all = {
"label": label_df.reindex(feature_selected.index),
"feature": feature_selected,
}
df_all = pd.concat(df_all, axis=1)
df_all.to_pickle(DIRNAME / "fea_label_df.pkl")
# dump data in handler format for aligning the interface
handler = DataHandlerLP(
data_loader={
"class": "qlib.data.dataset.loader.StaticDataLoader",
"kwargs": {"config": DIRNAME / "fea_label_df.pkl"},
}
)
handler.to_pickle(DIRNAME / self.proxy_hd, dump_all=True)
@property
def _internal_data_path(self):
return DIRNAME / f"internal_data_s{self.step}.pkl"
def dump_meta_ipt(self):
"""
Dump data for training meta model.
This function will dump the input data for meta model
"""
# According to the experiments, the choice of the model type is very important for achieving good results
rb = RollingBenchmark(model_type=self.sim_task_model, **self.rb_kwargs)
sim_task = rb.basic_task()
if self.sim_task_model == "gbdt":
sim_task["model"].setdefault("kwargs", {}).update({"early_stopping_rounds": None, "num_boost_round": 150})
exp_name_sim = f"data_sim_s{self.step}"
internal_data = InternalData(sim_task, self.step, exp_name=exp_name_sim)
internal_data.setup(trainer=TrainerR)
with self._internal_data_path.open("wb") as f:
pickle.dump(internal_data, f)
def train_meta_model(self, fill_method="max"):
"""
training a meta model based on a simplified linear proxy model;
"""
# 1) leverage the simplified proxy forecasting model to train meta model.
# - Only the dataset part is important, in current version of meta model will integrate the
rb = RollingBenchmark(model_type=self.sim_task_model, **self.rb_kwargs)
sim_task = rb.basic_task()
train_start = self.rb_kwargs.get("train_start", "2008-01-01")
train_end = "2010-12-31" if self.meta_1st_train_end is None else self.meta_1st_train_end
test_start = (pd.Timestamp(train_end) + pd.Timedelta(days=1)).strftime("%Y-%m-%d")
proxy_forecast_model_task = {
# "model": "qlib.contrib.model.linear.LinearModel",
"dataset": {
"class": "qlib.data.dataset.DatasetH",
"kwargs": {
"handler": f"file://{(DIRNAME / self.proxy_hd).absolute()}",
"segments": {
"train": (train_start, train_end),
"test": (test_start, sim_task["dataset"]["kwargs"]["segments"]["test"][1]),
},
},
},
# "record": ["qlib.workflow.record_temp.SignalRecord"]
}
# the proxy_forecast_model_task will be used to create meta tasks.
# The test date of first task will be 2011-01-01. Each test segment will be about 20days
# The tasks include all training tasks and test tasks.
# 2) preparing meta dataset
kwargs = dict(
task_tpl=proxy_forecast_model_task,
step=self.step,
segments=0.62, # keep test period consistent with the dataset yaml
trunc_days=1 + self.horizon,
hist_step_n=30,
fill_method=fill_method,
rolling_ext_days=0,
)
# NOTE:
# the input of meta model (internal data) are shared between proxy model and final forecasting model
# but their task test segment are not aligned! It worked in my previous experiment.
# So the misalignment will not affect the effectiveness of the method.
with self._internal_data_path.open("rb") as f:
internal_data = pickle.load(f)
md = MetaDatasetDS(exp_name=internal_data, **kwargs)
# 3) train and logging meta model
with R.start(experiment_name=self.meta_exp_name):
R.log_params(**kwargs)
mm = MetaModelDS(
step=self.step, hist_step_n=kwargs["hist_step_n"], lr=0.001, max_epoch=100, seed=43, alpha=self.alpha
)
mm.fit(md)
R.save_objects(model=mm)
@property
def _task_path(self):
return DIRNAME / f"tasks_s{self.step}.pkl"
def meta_inference(self):
"""
Leverage meta-model for inference:
- Given
- baseline tasks
- input for meta model(internal data)
- meta model (its learnt knowledge on proxy forecasting model is expected to transfer to normal forecasting model)
"""
# 1) get meta model
exp = R.get_exp(experiment_name=self.meta_exp_name)
rec = exp.list_recorders(rtype=exp.RT_L)[0]
meta_model: MetaModelDS = rec.load_object("model")
# 2)
# we are transfer to knowledge of meta model to final forecasting tasks.
# Create MetaTaskDataset for the final forecasting tasks
# Aligning the setting of it to the MetaTaskDataset when training Meta model is necessary
# 2.1) get previous config
param = rec.list_params()
trunc_days = int(param["trunc_days"])
step = int(param["step"])
hist_step_n = int(param["hist_step_n"])
fill_method = param.get("fill_method", "max")
rb = RollingBenchmark(model_type=self.forecast_model, **self.rb_kwargs)
task_l = rb.create_rolling_tasks()
# 2.2) create meta dataset for final dataset
kwargs = dict(
task_tpl=task_l,
step=step,
segments=0.0, # all the tasks are for testing
trunc_days=trunc_days,
hist_step_n=hist_step_n,
fill_method=fill_method,
task_mode=MetaTask.PROC_MODE_TRANSFER,
)
with self._internal_data_path.open("rb") as f:
internal_data = pickle.load(f)
mds = MetaDatasetDS(exp_name=internal_data, **kwargs)
# 3) meta model make inference and get new qlib task
new_tasks = meta_model.inference(mds)
with self._task_path.open("wb") as f:
pickle.dump(new_tasks, f)
def train_and_eval_tasks(self):
"""
Training the tasks generated by meta model
Then evaluate it
"""
with self._task_path.open("rb") as f:
tasks = pickle.load(f)
rb = RollingBenchmark(rolling_exp="rolling_ds", model_type=self.forecast_model, **self.rb_kwargs)
rb.train_rolling_tasks(tasks)
rb.ens_rolling()
rb.update_rolling_rec()
def run_all(self):
# 1) file: handler_proxy.pkl (self.proxy_hd)
self.dump_data_for_proxy_model()
# 2)
# file: internal_data_s20.pkl
# mlflow: data_sim_s20, models for calculating meta_ipt
self.dump_meta_ipt()
# 3) meta model will be stored in `DDG-DA`
self.train_meta_model()
# 4) new_tasks are saved in "tasks_s20.pkl" (reweighter is added)
self.meta_inference()
# 5) load the saved tasks and train model
self.train_and_eval_tasks()
if __name__ == "__main__":
GetData().qlib_data(exists_skip=True)
auto_init()
fire.Fire(DDGDABench)
fire.Fire(DDGDA)

View File

@@ -8,17 +8,15 @@ The table below shows the performances of different solutions on different forec
Here is the [crowd sourced version of qlib data](data_collector/crowd_source/README.md): https://github.com/chenditc/investment_data/releases
```bash
wget https://github.com/chenditc/investment_data/releases/download/20220720/qlib_bin.tar.gz
mkdir -p ~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data
tar -zxvf qlib_bin.tar.gz -C ~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data --strip-components=2
rm -f qlib_bin.tar.gz
```
| Model Name | Dataset | IC | ICIR | Rank IC | Rank ICIR | Annualized Return | Information Ratio | Max Drawdown |
|------------------|---------|------|------|---------|-----------|-------------------|-------------------|--------------|
| RR[Linear] |Alpha158 |0.0945|0.5989|0.1069 |0.6495 |0.0857 |1.3682 |-0.0986 |
| DDG-DA[Linear] |Alpha158 |0.0983|0.6157|0.1108 |0.6646 |0.0764 |1.1904 |-0.0769 |
| RR[LightGBM] |Alpha158 |0.0816|0.5887|0.0912 |0.6263 |0.0771 |1.3196 |-0.0909 |
| DDG-DA[LightGBM] |Alpha158 |0.0878|0.6185|0.0975 |0.6524 |0.1261 |2.0096 |-0.0744 |
|------------------|---------|----|------|---------|-----------|-------------------|-------------------|--------------|
| RR[Linear] |Alpha158 |0.089|0.577|0.102 |0.627 |0.093 |1.458 |-0.073 |
| DDG-DA[Linear] |Alpha158 |0.096|0.636|0.107 |0.677 |0.067 |0.996 |-0.091 |
| RR[LightGBM] |Alpha158 |0.082|0.589|0.091 |0.626 |0.077 |1.320 |-0.091 |
| DDG-DA[LightGBM] |Alpha158 |0.085|0.658|0.094 |0.686 |0.115 |1.792 |-0.068 |
- The label horizon of the `Alpha158` dataset is set to 20.
- The rolling time intervals are set to 20 trading days.

View File

@@ -5,12 +5,11 @@ This is the framework of periodically Rolling Retrain (RR) forecasting models. R
## Run the Code
Users can try RR by running the following command:
```bash
python rolling_benchmark.py run
python rolling_benchmark.py run_all
```
The default forecasting models are `Linear`. Users can choose other forecasting models by changing the `model_type` parameter.
For example, users can try `LightGBM` forecasting models by running the following command:
```bash
python rolling_benchmark.py --conf_path=workflow_config_lightgbm_Alpha158.yaml run
```
python rolling_benchmark.py --model_type="gbdt" run_all
```

View File

@@ -1,33 +1,160 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
# Licensed under the MIT License.
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Union
from typing import Optional
from qlib.model.ens.ensemble import RollingEnsemble
from qlib.utils import init_instance_by_config
import fire
import yaml
import pandas as pd
from qlib import auto_init
from qlib.contrib.rolling.base import Rolling
from pathlib import Path
from tqdm.auto import tqdm
from qlib.model.trainer import TrainerR
from qlib.log import get_module_logger
from qlib.utils.data import update_config
from qlib.workflow import R
from qlib.tests.data import GetData
DIRNAME = Path(__file__).absolute().resolve().parent
from qlib.workflow.task.gen import task_generator, RollingGen
from qlib.workflow.task.collect import RecorderCollector
from qlib.workflow.record_temp import PortAnaRecord, SigAnaRecord
class RollingBenchmark(Rolling):
# The config in the README.md
CONF_LIST = [DIRNAME / "workflow_config_linear_Alpha158.yaml", DIRNAME / "workflow_config_lightgbm_Alpha158.yaml"]
class RollingBenchmark:
"""
**NOTE**
before running the example, please clean your previous results with following command
- `rm -r mlruns`
DEFAULT_CONF = CONF_LIST[0]
"""
def __init__(self, conf_path: Union[str, Path] = DEFAULT_CONF, horizon=20, **kwargs) -> None:
# This code is for being compatible with the previous old code
conf_path = Path(conf_path)
super().__init__(conf_path=conf_path, horizon=horizon, **kwargs)
def __init__(
self,
rolling_exp: str = "rolling_models",
model_type: str = "linear",
h_path: Optional[str] = None,
train_start: Optional[str] = None,
test_end: Optional[str] = None,
task_ext_conf: Optional[dict] = None,
) -> None:
"""
Parameters
----------
rolling_exp : str
The name for the experiments for rolling
model_type : str
The model to be boosted.
h_path : Optional[str]
the dumped data handler;
test_end : Optional[str]
the test end for the data. It is typically used together with the handler
train_start : Optional[str]
the train start for the data. It is typically used together with the handler.
task_ext_conf : Optional[dict]
some option to update the
"""
self.step = 20
self.horizon = 20
self.rolling_exp = rolling_exp
self.model_type = model_type
self.h_path = h_path
self.train_start = train_start
self.test_end = test_end
self.logger = get_module_logger("RollingBenchmark")
self.task_ext_conf = task_ext_conf
for f in self.CONF_LIST:
if conf_path.samefile(f):
break
def basic_task(self):
"""For fast training rolling"""
if self.model_type == "gbdt":
conf_path = DIRNAME.parent.parent / "benchmarks" / "LightGBM" / "workflow_config_lightgbm_Alpha158.yaml"
# dump the processed data on to disk for later loading to speed up the processing
h_path = DIRNAME / "lightgbm_alpha158_handler_horizon{}.pkl".format(self.horizon)
elif self.model_type == "linear":
conf_path = DIRNAME.parent.parent / "benchmarks" / "Linear" / "workflow_config_linear_Alpha158.yaml"
h_path = DIRNAME / "linear_alpha158_handler_horizon{}.pkl".format(self.horizon)
else:
self.logger.warning("Model type is not in the benchmark!")
raise AssertionError("Model type is not supported!")
if self.h_path is not None:
h_path = Path(self.h_path)
with conf_path.open("r") as f:
conf = yaml.safe_load(f)
# modify dataset horizon
conf["task"]["dataset"]["kwargs"]["handler"]["kwargs"]["label"] = [
"Ref($close, -{}) / Ref($close, -1) - 1".format(self.horizon + 1)
]
task = conf["task"]
if self.task_ext_conf is not None:
task = update_config(task, self.task_ext_conf)
if not h_path.exists():
h_conf = task["dataset"]["kwargs"]["handler"]
h = init_instance_by_config(h_conf)
h.to_pickle(h_path, dump_all=True)
task["dataset"]["kwargs"]["handler"] = f"file://{h_path}"
task["record"] = ["qlib.workflow.record_temp.SignalRecord"]
if self.train_start is not None:
seg = task["dataset"]["kwargs"]["segments"]["train"]
task["dataset"]["kwargs"]["segments"]["train"] = pd.Timestamp(self.train_start), seg[1]
if self.test_end is not None:
seg = task["dataset"]["kwargs"]["segments"]["test"]
task["dataset"]["kwargs"]["segments"]["test"] = seg[0], pd.Timestamp(self.test_end)
self.logger.info(task)
return task
def create_rolling_tasks(self):
task = self.basic_task()
task_l = task_generator(
task, RollingGen(step=self.step, trunc_days=self.horizon + 1)
) # the last two days should be truncated to avoid information leakage
return task_l
def train_rolling_tasks(self, task_l=None):
if task_l is None:
task_l = self.create_rolling_tasks()
trainer = TrainerR(experiment_name=self.rolling_exp)
trainer(task_l)
COMB_EXP = "rolling"
def ens_rolling(self):
rc = RecorderCollector(
experiment=self.rolling_exp,
artifacts_key=["pred", "label"],
process_list=[RollingEnsemble()],
# rec_key_func=lambda rec: (self.COMB_EXP, rec.info["id"]),
artifacts_path={"pred": "pred.pkl", "label": "label.pkl"},
)
res = rc()
with R.start(experiment_name=self.COMB_EXP):
R.log_params(exp_name=self.rolling_exp)
R.save_objects(**{"pred.pkl": res["pred"], "label.pkl": res["label"]})
def update_rolling_rec(self):
"""
Evaluate the combined rolling results
"""
for _, rec in R.list_recorders(experiment_name=self.COMB_EXP).items():
for rt_cls in SigAnaRecord, PortAnaRecord:
rt = rt_cls(recorder=rec, skip_existing=True)
rt.generate()
print(f"Your evaluation results can be found in the experiment named `{self.COMB_EXP}`.")
def run_all(self):
# the results will be save in mlruns.
# 1) each rolling task is saved in rolling_models
self.train_rolling_tasks()
# 2) combined rolling tasks and evaluation results are saved in rolling
self.ens_rolling()
self.update_rolling_rec()
if __name__ == "__main__":

View File

@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
qlib_init:
provider_uri: "~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data"
region: cn
market: &market csi300
benchmark: &benchmark SH000300
data_handler_config: &data_handler_config
start_time: 2008-01-01
end_time: 2020-08-01
fit_start_time: 2008-01-01
fit_end_time: 2014-12-31
instruments: *market
port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
strategy:
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:
start_time: 2017-01-01
end_time: 2020-08-01
account: 100000000
benchmark: *benchmark
exchange_kwargs:
limit_threshold: 0.095
deal_price: close
open_cost: 0.0005
close_cost: 0.0015
min_cost: 5
task:
model:
class: LGBModel
module_path: qlib.contrib.model.gbdt
kwargs:
loss: mse
colsample_bytree: 0.8879
learning_rate: 0.2
subsample: 0.8789
lambda_l1: 205.6999
lambda_l2: 580.9768
max_depth: 8
num_leaves: 210
num_threads: 20
dataset:
class: DatasetH
module_path: qlib.data.dataset
kwargs:
handler:
class: Alpha158
module_path: qlib.contrib.data.handler
kwargs: *data_handler_config
segments:
train: [2008-01-01, 2014-12-31]
valid: [2015-01-01, 2016-12-31]
test: [2017-01-01, 2020-08-01]
record:
- class: SignalRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
- class: SigAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
ana_long_short: False
ann_scaler: 252
- class: PortAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
config: *port_analysis_config

View File

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
qlib_init:
provider_uri: "~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data"
region: cn
market: &market csi300
benchmark: &benchmark SH000300
data_handler_config: &data_handler_config
start_time: 2008-01-01
end_time: 2020-08-01
fit_start_time: 2008-01-01
fit_end_time: 2014-12-31
instruments: *market
infer_processors:
- class: RobustZScoreNorm
kwargs:
fields_group: feature
clip_outlier: true
- class: Fillna
kwargs:
fields_group: feature
learn_processors:
- class: DropnaLabel
- class: CSRankNorm
kwargs:
fields_group: label
port_analysis_config: &port_analysis_config
strategy:
class: TopkDropoutStrategy
module_path: qlib.contrib.strategy
kwargs:
signal: <PRED>
topk: 50
n_drop: 5
backtest:
start_time: 2017-01-01
end_time: 2020-08-01
account: 100000000
benchmark: *benchmark
exchange_kwargs:
limit_threshold: 0.095
deal_price: close
open_cost: 0.0005
close_cost: 0.0015
min_cost: 5
task:
model:
class: LinearModel
module_path: qlib.contrib.model.linear
kwargs:
estimator: ridge
alpha: 0.05
dataset:
class: DatasetH
module_path: qlib.data.dataset
kwargs:
handler:
class: Alpha158
module_path: qlib.contrib.data.handler
kwargs: *data_handler_config
segments:
train: [2008-01-01, 2014-12-31]
valid: [2015-01-01, 2016-12-31]
test: [2017-01-01, 2020-08-01]
record:
- class: SignalRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
model: <MODEL>
dataset: <DATASET>
- class: SigAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
ana_long_short: True
ann_scaler: 252
- class: PortAnaRecord
module_path: qlib.workflow.record_temp
kwargs:
config: *port_analysis_config

View File

@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ class HighFreqHandler(DataHandlerLP):
fit_end_time=None,
drop_raw=True,
):
infer_processors = check_transform_proc(infer_processors, fit_start_time, fit_end_time)
learn_processors = check_transform_proc(learn_processors, fit_start_time, fit_end_time)

View File

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ from highfreq_ops import get_calendar_day, DayLast, FFillNan, BFillNan, Date, Se
class HighfreqWorkflow:
SPEC_CONF = {"custom_ops": [DayLast, FFillNan, BFillNan, Date, Select, IsNull, Cut], "expression_cache": None}
MARKET = "all"

View File

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ def objective(trial):
if __name__ == "__main__":
provider_uri = "~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data"
GetData().qlib_data(target_dir=provider_uri, region=REG_CN, exists_skip=True)
qlib.init(provider_uri=provider_uri, region="cn")

View File

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ def objective(trial):
if __name__ == "__main__":
provider_uri = "~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data"
GetData().qlib_data(target_dir=provider_uri, region=REG_CN, exists_skip=True)
qlib.init(provider_uri=provider_uri, region=REG_CN)

View File

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ from qlib.tests.config import CSI300_GBDT_TASK
if __name__ == "__main__":
# use default data
provider_uri = "~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data" # target_dir
GetData().qlib_data(target_dir=provider_uri, region=REG_CN, exists_skip=True)

View File

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ from qlib.model.riskmodel import StructuredCovEstimator
def prepare_data(riskdata_root="./riskdata", T=240, start_time="2016-01-01"):
universe = D.features(D.instruments("csi300"), ["$close"], start_time=start_time).swaplevel().sort_index()
price_all = (
@@ -19,6 +20,7 @@ def prepare_data(riskdata_root="./riskdata", T=240, start_time="2016-01-01"):
riskmodel = StructuredCovEstimator()
for i in range(T - 1, len(price_all)):
date = price_all.index[i]
ref_date = price_all.index[i - T + 1]
@@ -45,6 +47,7 @@ def prepare_data(riskdata_root="./riskdata", T=240, start_time="2016-01-01"):
if __name__ == "__main__":
import qlib
qlib.init(provider_uri="~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data")

View File

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ from qlib.tests.data import GetData
class RollingDataWorkflow:
MARKET = "csi300"
start_time = "2010-01-01"
end_time = "2019-12-31"
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ class RollingDataWorkflow:
dataset = init_instance_by_config(dataset_config)
for rolling_offset in range(self.rolling_cnt):
print(f"===========rolling{rolling_offset} start===========")
if rolling_offset:
dataset.config(

View File

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ from qlib.tests.config import CSI300_BENCH, CSI300_GBDT_TASK
if __name__ == "__main__":
# use default data
provider_uri = "~/.qlib/qlib_data/cn_data" # target_dir
GetData().qlib_data(target_dir=provider_uri, region=REG_CN, exists_skip=True)

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
# Licensed under the MIT License.
from pathlib import Path
__version__ = "0.9.2.99"
__version__ = "0.9.1.99"
__version__bak = __version__ # This version is backup for QlibConfig.reset_qlib_version
import os
from typing import Union
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ def init(default_conf="client", **kwargs):
def _mount_nfs_uri(provider_uri, mount_path, auto_mount: bool = False):
LOG = get_module_logger("mount nfs", level=logging.INFO)
if mount_path is None:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid mount path: {mount_path}!")

View File

@@ -179,9 +179,10 @@ def get_strategy_executor(
executor: Union[str, dict, object, Path],
benchmark: Optional[str] = "SH000300",
account: Union[float, int, dict] = 1e9,
exchange_kwargs: dict = {},
exchange_kwargs: Union[dict, Exchange] = {}, # TODO: rename parameter
pos_type: str = "Position",
) -> Tuple[BaseStrategy, BaseExecutor]:
# NOTE:
# - for avoiding recursive import
# - typing annotations is not reliable
@@ -196,12 +197,15 @@ def get_strategy_executor(
pos_type=pos_type,
)
exchange_kwargs = copy.copy(exchange_kwargs)
if "start_time" not in exchange_kwargs:
exchange_kwargs["start_time"] = start_time
if "end_time" not in exchange_kwargs:
exchange_kwargs["end_time"] = end_time
trade_exchange = get_exchange(**exchange_kwargs)
if isinstance(exchange_kwargs, Exchange):
trade_exchange = exchange_kwargs
else:
exchange_kwargs = copy.copy(exchange_kwargs)
if "start_time" not in exchange_kwargs:
exchange_kwargs["start_time"] = start_time
if "end_time" not in exchange_kwargs:
exchange_kwargs["end_time"] = end_time
trade_exchange = get_exchange(**exchange_kwargs)
common_infra = CommonInfrastructure(trade_account=trade_account, trade_exchange=trade_exchange)
trade_strategy = init_instance_by_config(strategy, accept_types=BaseStrategy)

View File

@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ def collect_data_loop(
trade_strategy: BaseStrategy,
trade_executor: BaseExecutor,
return_value: dict | None = None,
show_progress: bool = True,
) -> Generator[BaseTradeDecision, Optional[BaseTradeDecision], None]:
"""Generator for collecting the trade decision data for rl training
@@ -74,6 +75,8 @@ def collect_data_loop(
the outermost executor
return_value : dict
used for backtest_loop
show_progress: bool
whether to show execution progress
Yields
-------
@@ -83,7 +86,8 @@ def collect_data_loop(
trade_executor.reset(start_time=start_time, end_time=end_time)
trade_strategy.reset(level_infra=trade_executor.get_level_infra())
with tqdm(total=trade_executor.trade_calendar.get_trade_len(), desc="backtest loop") as bar:
disable = not show_progress
with tqdm(total=trade_executor.trade_calendar.get_trade_len(), desc="backtest loop", disable=disable) as bar:
_execute_result = None
while not trade_executor.finished():
_trade_decision: BaseTradeDecision = trade_strategy.generate_trade_decision(_execute_result)

View File

@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ class Exchange:
necessary_fields = {self.buy_price, self.sell_price, "$close", "$change", "$factor", "$volume"}
if self.limit_type == self.LT_TP_EXP:
assert isinstance(limit_threshold, tuple)
assert isinstance(limit_threshold, tuple) or (isinstance(limit_threshold, list) and len(limit_threshold) == 2)
for exp in limit_threshold:
necessary_fields.add(exp)
all_fields = list(necessary_fields | set(vol_lt_fields) | set(subscribe_fields))
@@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ class Exchange:
"""get limit type"""
if isinstance(limit_threshold, tuple):
return self.LT_TP_EXP
if isinstance(limit_threshold, list):
assert len(limit_threshold) == 2
return self.LT_TP_EXP
elif isinstance(limit_threshold, float):
return self.LT_FLT
elif limit_threshold is None:
@@ -325,7 +328,7 @@ class Exchange:
assert isinstance(volume_threshold, dict)
for key, vol_limit in volume_threshold.items():
assert isinstance(vol_limit, tuple)
assert isinstance(vol_limit, tuple) or (isinstance(vol_limit, list) and len(vol_limit) == 2)
fields.add(vol_limit[1])
if key in ("buy", "all"):
@@ -638,6 +641,7 @@ class Exchange:
random.seed(0)
random.shuffle(sorted_ids)
for stock_id in sorted_ids:
# Do not generate order for the non-tradable stocks
if not self.is_stock_tradable(stock_id=stock_id, start_time=start_time, end_time=end_time):
continue
@@ -802,7 +806,7 @@ class Exchange:
vol_limit_num: List[float] = []
for limit in vol_limit:
assert isinstance(limit, tuple)
assert isinstance(limit, tuple) or (isinstance(limit, list) and len(limit) == 2)
if limit[0] == "current":
limit_value = self.quote.get_data(
order.stock_id,

View File

@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ class QlibConfig(Config):
"""
def __init__(self, provider_uri: Union[str, Path, dict], mount_path: Union[str, Path, dict]):
"""
The relation of `provider_uri` and `mount_path`
- `mount_path` is used only if provider_uri is an NFS path
@@ -486,8 +487,5 @@ class QlibConfig(Config):
return self._registered
DEFAULT_QLIB_DOT_PATH = Path("~/.qlib/").expanduser()
# global config
C = QlibConfig(_default_config)

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More