From 35cd7b63cbfb8937995763caf10556d50effba11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Kane <andrew@ankane.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 17:02:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Updated readme [skip ci]

---
 README.md | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 9ea3287..98749b4 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -438,6 +438,8 @@ SELECT ...
 COMMIT;
 ```
 
+Also, if the table is small, a table scan may be faster.
+
 #### Why isn’t a query using a parallel table scan?
 
 The planner doesn’t consider [out-of-line storage](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/storage-toast.html) in cost estimates, which can make a serial scan look cheaper. You can reduce the cost of a parallel scan for a query with: