## Problem
AI was calculating position_size_usd incorrectly, treating it as margin requirement instead of notional value, causing code=-2019 errors (insufficient margin).
## Solution
### 1. Updated AI prompts with correct formula
- **prompts/adaptive.txt**: Added clear position sizing calculation steps
- **prompts/nof1.txt**: Added English version with example
- **prompts/default.txt**: Added Chinese version with example
**Correct formula:**
1. Available Margin = Available Cash × 0.95 × Allocation % (reserve 5% for fees)
2. Notional Value = Available Margin × Leverage
3. position_size_usd = Notional Value (this is the value for JSON)
**Example:** $500 cash, 5x leverage → position_size_usd = $2,375 (not $500)
### 2. Added code-level validation
- **trader/auto_trader.go**: Added margin checks in executeOpenLong/ShortWithRecord
- Validates required margin + fees ≤ available balance before opening position
- Returns clear error message if insufficient
## Impact
- Prevents code=-2019 errors
- AI now understands the difference between notional value and margin requirement
- Double validation: AI prompt + code check
## Testing
- ✅ Compiles successfully
- ⚠️ Requires live trading environment testing
Add detailed guidance chapter for dynamic TP/SL management and partial close operations.
## Changes
- New chapter: "动态止盈止损与部分平仓指引" (Dynamic TP/SL & Partial Close Guidance)
- Inserted between "可用动作" (Actions) and "决策流程" (Decision Flow) sections
- 4 key guidance points covering:
1. Partial close best practices (use clear percentages like 25%/50%/75%)
2. Reassessing remaining position after partial exit
3. Proper use cases for update_stop_loss / update_take_profit
4. Multi-stage exit strategy requirements
## Benefits
- ✅ Provides concrete operational guidelines for AI decision-making
- ✅ Clarifies when and how to use partial_close effectively
- ✅ Emphasizes remaining position management (prevents "orphan" positions)
- ✅ Aligns with existing backend support for partial_close action
## Background
While adaptive.txt already lists partial_close as an available action,
it lacked detailed operational guidance. This enhancement fills that gap
by providing specific percentages, use cases, and multi-stage exit examples.
Backend (decision/engine.go) already validates partial_close with
close_percentage field, so this is purely a prompt enhancement with
no code changes required.
Co-Authored-By: tinkle-community <tinklefund@gmail.com>
